Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 1.11, Δ 0.02).
- Huddersfield was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 17%).
- Huddersfield held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 273Lead | Accurate passes | 239 |
| 372Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.