Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (3.40 vs 1.20, Δ 2.20).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (19 vs 16 shots).
- Huddersfield was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 3.40Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 145 | Accurate passes | 483Lead |
| 215 | Total passes | 550Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |