Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 0.43, Δ 0.06).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 292 | Accurate passes | 350Lead |
| 402 | Total passes | 461Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |