Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (2.56 vs 0.63, Δ 1.93).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Huddersfield was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 2.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 315Lead | Accurate passes | 311 |
| 417Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.