Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (0.47 vs 1.04, Δ 0.57).
- QPR fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Huddersfield was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 0.47 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 5 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 194 | Accurate passes | 367Lead |
| 319 | Total passes | 488Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.