Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 1.37, Δ 0.72).
- Rotherham fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Huddersfield held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.37Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 327Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 430Lead | Total passes | 357 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |