Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (2.90 vs 1.23, Δ 1.67).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- Wycombe was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 2.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 238 | Accurate passes | 294Lead |
| 318 | Total passes | 408Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |