Match statistics snapshot
- Hull City created the clearer chances on xG (1.41 vs 0.38, Δ 1.03).
- Hull City fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hull City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hull City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 611Lead | Accurate passes | 318 |
| 686Lead | Total passes | 392 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hull City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hull City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hull City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |