Match statistics snapshot
- Hull City created the clearer chances on xG (2.26 vs 1.87, Δ 0.39).
- Hull City fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hull City | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 2.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.87 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hull City | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 365 | Accurate passes | 367Lead |
| 442 | Total passes | 449Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hull City | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hull City | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -1.11 | Goals prevented | -1.11 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hull City | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |