Match statistics snapshot
- Middlesbrough created the clearer chances on xG (0.33 vs 0.82, Δ 0.49).
- Middlesbrough fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (17% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hull City | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 0.33 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hull City | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 142 | Accurate passes | 342Lead |
| 202 | Total passes | 398Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hull City | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hull City | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| 0.11 | Goals prevented | 0.11 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hull City | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Fouls | 2Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |