Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 1.31, Δ 0.18).
- QPR fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 88% |
| 490Lead | Accurate passes | 400 |
| 557Lead | Total passes | 456 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |