Match statistics snapshot
- QPR created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 1.34, Δ 0.19).
- Hull City fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 312Lead | Accurate passes | 311 |
| 406Lead | Total passes | 395 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.62 | Goals prevented | -0.62 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hull City | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.