Match statistics snapshot
- Hull City created the clearer chances on xG (3.72 vs 0.53, Δ 3.19).
- Hull City fired more attempts (22 vs 9 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hull City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 3.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hull City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 690Lead | Accurate passes | 194 |
| 745Lead | Total passes | 261 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hull City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hull City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hull City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.