Match statistics snapshot
- Stoke City created the clearer chances on xG (0.70 vs 1.39, Δ 0.69).
- Stoke City fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Stoke City was more accurate in front of goal (24% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hull City | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.70 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.39Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hull City | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 413Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 494Lead | Total passes | 300 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hull City | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hull City | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hull City | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.