Match statistics snapshot
- Hull City fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
- Wolves held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hull City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hull City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 341 | Accurate passes | 508Lead |
| 433 | Total passes | 610Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hull City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hull City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hull City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |