Match statistics snapshot
- Huracan created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 0.42, Δ 1.38).
- Huracan fired more attempts (21 vs 5 shots).
- Huracan was more accurate in front of goal (52% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Huracan | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Huracan | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Huracan | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Huracan | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| 0.67 | Goals prevented | 0.67 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Huracan | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |