Match statistics snapshot
- Lyngby created the clearer chances on xG (1.18 vs 2.15, Δ 0.97).
- Lyngby fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Lyngby was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hvidovre | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 1.18 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.15Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hvidovre | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 285 |
| 487Lead | Total passes | 370 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hvidovre | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hvidovre | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hvidovre | Statistic | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.