Match statistics snapshot
- Mjallby AIF created the clearer chances on xG (0.45 vs 1.34, Δ 0.89).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Brommapojkarna | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Brommapojkarna | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 327 | Accurate passes | 411Lead |
| 417 | Total passes | 499Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Brommapojkarna | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Brommapojkarna | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Brommapojkarna | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.