Match statistics snapshot
- AS Roma created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 1.52, Δ 0.23).
- AS Roma fired more attempts (23 vs 6 shots).
- IF elfsborg was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | Ball possession | 75%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 787Lead |
| 278 | Total passes | 852Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.16 | Goals prevented | 0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |