Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.86 vs 0.47, Δ 2.39).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (20 vs 8 shots).
- BK Hacken held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 2.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 370 | Accurate passes | 501Lead |
| 436 | Total passes | 565Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |