Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.65 vs 1.10, Δ 1.55).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (23 vs 11 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 48%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 2.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 310Lead | Accurate passes | 211 |
| 410Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |