Match statistics snapshot
- Gais created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 2.41, Δ 0.99).
- Gais fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- IF elfsborg was more accurate in front of goal (18% on target vs 6%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.41Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 257 | Accurate passes | 500Lead |
| 334 | Total passes | 580Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Gais |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |