Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 46%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 6 |
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 346Lead | Accurate passes | 313 |
| 453Lead | Total passes | 426 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |