Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
- IF elfsborg held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 1 | Shots off target | 2Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 431Lead | Accurate passes | 224 |
| 538Lead | Total passes | 345 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.