Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.68, Δ 0.36).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Mjallby AIF held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 255 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 338 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.