Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.28 vs 0.60, Δ 1.68).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- IF elfsborg was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2.28Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 485Lead |
| 316 | Total passes | 574Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.