Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.37 vs 0.81, Δ 1.56).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| Offsides | ||
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 374 | Accurate passes | 477Lead |
| 446 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |