Match statistics snapshot
- Nice created the clearer chances on xG (0.77 vs 1.70, Δ 0.93).
- Nice fired more attempts (22 vs 9 shots).
- Nice was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 558Lead |
| 293 | Total passes | 626Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.20 | Goals prevented | -0.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| If Elfsborg | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |