Match statistics snapshot
- Djurgardens IF created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 0.89, Δ 0.26).
- IFK Goteborg fired more attempts (10 vs 5 shots).
- Djurgardens IF was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.89Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 371Lead | Accurate passes | 358 |
| 459Lead | Total passes | 432 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Djurgardens If |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |