Match statistics snapshot
- IFK Goteborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.12 vs 2.02, Δ 0.10).
- IFK Goteborg fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.02 |
| Offsides | ||
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 396Lead | Accurate passes | 234 |
| 513Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.