Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF created the clearer chances on xG (0.51 vs 1.60, Δ 1.09).
- Hammarby FF fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Hammarby FF was more accurate in front of goal (19% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 0.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 184 | Accurate passes | 367Lead |
| 260 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ifk Goteborg | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |