Match statistics snapshot
- IFK Norrkoping created the clearer chances on xG (2.38 vs 0.53, Δ 1.85).
- IFK Norrkoping fired more attempts (33 vs 10 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 2.38Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 23Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 33Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 205 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 297 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |