Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby FF fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Hammarby FF was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 22%).
- Hammarby FF held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 255 | Accurate passes | 485Lead |
| 318 | Total passes | 560Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |