Match statistics snapshot
- IFK Norrkoping created the clearer chances on xG (1.96 vs 1.75, Δ 0.21).
- IFK Norrkoping fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.75 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 370Lead | Accurate passes | 314 |
| 462Lead | Total passes | 392 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ifk Norrkoping | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.