Match statistics snapshot
- Halmstad created the clearer chances on xG (1.95 vs 1.98, Δ 0.03).
- IFK Varnamo fired more attempts (21 vs 13 shots).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.98Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 546Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 626Lead | Total passes | 282 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |