Match statistics snapshot
- Halmstad created the clearer chances on xG (0.56 vs 1.22, Δ 0.66).
- Halmstad was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
- IFK Varnamo held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 0.56 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 548Lead | Accurate passes | 180 |
| 651Lead | Total passes | 276 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ifk Varnamo | Statistic | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.