Match statistics snapshot
- IK brage created the clearer chances on xG (2.30 vs 1.99, Δ 0.31).
- Sandviken was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
- Sandviken held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ik Brage | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 2.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.99 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ik Brage | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 330 | Accurate passes | 365Lead |
| 411 | Total passes | 452Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ik Brage | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ik Brage | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ik Brage | Statistic | Sandviken |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.