Match statistics snapshot
- Ilves created the clearer chances on xG (2.65 vs 0.78, Δ 1.87).
- Ilves fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Ilves was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ilves | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 2.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ilves | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 502Lead | Accurate passes | 466 |
| 571Lead | Total passes | 548 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ilves | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ilves | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ilves | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.