Match statistics snapshot
- Ilves created the clearer chances on xG (2.48 vs 0.81, Δ 1.67).
- Ilves fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- HJK Helsinki was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ilves | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 2.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ilves | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 495Lead | Accurate passes | 446 |
| 568Lead | Total passes | 520 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ilves | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ilves | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ilves | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Fouls | 5 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |