Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Turku created the clearer chances on xG (0.40 vs 1.56, Δ 1.16).
- Inter Turku fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Ilves was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.56Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 330 | Accurate passes | 463Lead |
| 395 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |