Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Turku created the clearer chances on xG (1.05 vs 2.04, Δ 0.99).
- Inter Turku fired more attempts (13 vs 5 shots).
- Inter Turku held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 1.05 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.04Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 354 | Accurate passes | 456Lead |
| 430 | Total passes | 529Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ilves | Statistic | Inter Turku |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |