Match statistics snapshot
- Atletico Tucuman fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Independ.
- Rivadavia was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 139 | Accurate passes | 203Lead |
| 217 | Total passes | 298Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Atletico Tucuman |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.