Match statistics snapshot
- Independ.
- Rivadavia created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 1.11, Δ 0.37).
- Independ.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 243Lead | Accurate passes | 231 |
| 322Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.48 | Goals prevented | -0.48 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 5Lead |