Match statistics snapshot
- Independ.
- Rivadavia created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 0.75, Δ 0.59).
- Independ.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 8Lead |
| 7 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 158 | Accurate passes | 550Lead |
| 221 | Total passes | 612Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.04 | Goals prevented | 0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |