Match statistics snapshot
- Lanus fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Independ.
- Rivadavia was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 219 | Accurate passes | 348Lead |
| 292 | Total passes | 414Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |