Match statistics snapshot
- Platense created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 0.92, Δ 0.40).
- Platense fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Platense was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 53% |
| 398Lead | Accurate passes | 102 |
| 510Lead | Total passes | 193 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | Platense |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.