Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (7 vs 2 shots).
- Independ.
- Rivadavia was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 0 |
| 3Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 7Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 103 | Accurate passes | 218Lead |
| 150 | Total passes | 244Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.