Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 2.09, Δ 0.65).
- Independ.
- Rivadavia fired more attempts (25 vs 16 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.09Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 150 | Accurate passes | 430Lead |
| 233 | Total passes | 525Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| 0.21 | Goals prevented | 0.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Independ. Rivadavia | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.