Match statistics snapshot
- Instituto Cordoba fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 27%).
- Instituto Cordoba held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 72%Lead | Pass accuracy | 56% |
| 309Lead | Accurate passes | 126 |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 226 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.