Match statistics snapshot
- Instituto Cordoba fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 41%).
- Instituto Cordoba held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 49% |
| 314Lead | Accurate passes | 95 |
| 425Lead | Total passes | 193 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.